Find the right funded account for how you trade. Filter by challenge cost,
drawdown limits, profit targets, payout percentage, and whether EAs and
algo trading are permitted.
Use the EA/Algo toggle if you run automated strategies — not all firms allow them.
New to prop trading? A funded account lets you trade a firm’s capital and keep a
percentage of profits. Pass a challenge, get funded, earn from there.
Data is reviewed regularly but rules change — always verify with the firm before purchasing.
Compare Prop Firms →
Apex is a futures-only firm and, by most trader accounts, the most controversial large prop firm currently operating — it also pays out more in absolute terms than most competitors, but has the highest reported rate of payout denials in the industry, including a documented $800,000 dispute between two traders.
Traders have filed complaints with the Michigan and Texas Attorneys General over accounts being put “under maintenance” during payout review, and Apex is currently pursuing a gag-order lawsuit against a YouTube creator over claims of retroactive rule changes and bait-and-switch practices. A 2026 program overhaul was marketed heavily around “no more payout denials” — worth watching whether that holds.
...
Blue Guardian is run by Iconic Exchange FZCO out of Dubai, founded in 2021. No rebrand history found.
Documented complaints include the firm quietly changing its daily-loss-limit enforcement from a soft warning to a hard account breach without directly notifying traders (updating only the FAQ), vague “shared device” or “ban evasion” terminations that traders say don’t hold up to scrutiny, and reports of the firm blocking traders on social media after they asked for evidence backing a breach claim. Trustpilot shows a 3.6/5 average across 2,166 reviews — mostly positive, but with a notable cluster of serious 1-star complaints.
...
City Traders Imperium has been operating since 2018 with one of the stronger trust profiles in this comparison — over 21,000 funded traders and $367M+ paid out, with a 4.3/5 Trustpilot score across roughly 1,700 reviews. No rebrand found.
There are standard-pattern complaints about payout denials tied to enforcement of copy-trading and high-risk-behavior rules, and a handful of reports of accounts being locked right before a payout request clears — but nothing that points to systemic bad faith, and the overall consensus across review sites is that CTI is legitimate.
...
E8 Funding rebranded to E8 Markets in November 2023 (the old e8funding.com domain now redirects), alongside a new Riseworks payout integration and clearer consistency-rule documentation.
Pre-rebrand, the firm had a public dispute over a $500,000 payout and reports of rules being added after the fact. Complaint volume looks meaningfully cleaner since the rebrand, though the account terms remain highly customizable (drawdown, daily loss, and payout split can all be adjusted at checkout), which makes direct comparison to other firms approximate.
...
FTMO is a Czech company founded in 2015 and is one of the longest-running, most recognized firms in the prop trading space. It’s generally considered legitimate, not a scam.
That said, it has a documented pattern of complaints: traders report passing the challenge, receiving one or two payouts, then getting hit with a “non-genuine trading” flag and a permanent ban with no clear explanation. There are also reports of timezone discrepancies between FTMO’s stated trading day and the platform’s displayed time affecting day-count rules, and of stop-loss orders being cancelled outright during price gaps on cTrader.
...
FundedNext (Bangladesh) runs several challenge types — Stellar, Rapid, Legacy, and Bolt — each with its own targets and drawdown rules, which makes like-for-like comparison harder than most firms in this list.
Documented complaints include a crypto refund that was approved and then retroactively rejected after the full processing window elapsed (escalated to Dubai consumer authorities), claims of after-the-fact rule enforcement, and a 3.5% payout processing fee that traders say isn’t clearly disclosed before purchase. Its official futures-challenge terms explicitly prohibit automated trading bots — we haven’t been able to confirm whether that also applies to the forex/CFD challenge.
...
Lux Trading Firm prices its challenges in GBP, not EUR/USD as an earlier version of this page had it — real 1-Step Evaluation tiers are £199 / £449 / £999 for 100k / 400k / 1M accounts.
The bigger issue: Lux operates without an FCA, ASIC, or other financial regulator license, and independent reviews report struggling to find confirmed accounts of traders actually being paid out. Trading-rule disputes are described by some traders as feeling designed to trip you up, and when the firm has acknowledged errors, it has attributed them to “database or server failures” without offering compensation. It is not the same company as the similarly-named “Lucid Trading” or “Luxemarkets” — those are separate, unrelated firms.
...
The5%ers is an Israel-based firm with a straightforward, low-cost entry ($74 flat fee across account sizes) and a scaling model that grows accounts up to $100k-$125k on performance.
Documented complaints include payout requests being approved and then later denied, and accounts being terminated over vaguely worded “integrity concerns” shortly after a trader requests a withdrawal — with support described as slow to respond and reluctant to give specifics when challenged.
...
Topstep is one of the oldest names in futures prop trading, billed as a monthly subscription ($49-$199/mo depending on account size) rather than a one-time fee.
As of April 2026, Topstep is named in an active federal lawsuit alleging a “systematic and deceptive scheme” involving shifting rules and profits held in an effectively inaccessible reserve account, on top of a history of Better Business Bureau complaints about account terminations arriving just before payout eligibility. Topstep has also taken legal action against at least one public critic, resulting in that person being barred from discussing the firm publicly — worth knowing given how much of prop-firm due diligence relies on public trader reporting.
...